Chicago Corruption Trials

A series of high-profile federal trials are challenging Chicago-style politics.

USA vs. Michael Madigan

Michael J. Madigan was the longest-serving state House speaker in the nation. In 2022, he was charged with leading a criminal enterprise designed to enhance his political power and generate income for his allies and associates. He was found guilty of a bribery conspiracy, bribery and wire fraud.

Michael Madigan’s sentencing hearing will cap the most aggressive, expansive corruption investigation in Chicago since the days of Rod Blagojevich. But many wonder: Would President Donald Trump grant clemency?
“A gentleman.” “A rule follower.” “Mr. Integrity.” As the feds seek a prison sentence for the former Illinois House speaker, supporters paint Madigan as a good man who “made mistakes.”
Madigan wielded the speaker’s gavel in Springfield for 36 years. Now he’s bracing to learn his fate June 13, when he’s due to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge John Blakey. The hearing comes four months after a jury convicted Madigan in an historic verdict.
USA v. Paul La Schiazza

Paul La Schiazza once served as the president of AT&T Illinois. In 2022, he was accused of conspiring to bribe former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan to benefit the utility. He has pleaded not guilty.

In September, a jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict in the case against former AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza.
U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman on Tuesday said he first wants to take a “serious look” at a motion for acquittal from ex-AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza.
Federal prosecutors heading into the biggest Chicago corruption trial since the days of Rod Blagojevich faced another setback Thursday.
USA v. Edward M. Burke

Edward M. Burke was the longest-serving member of Chicago’s City Council. But in 2019, a grand jury accused him of using his Council seat to steer business to his private law firm. He was found guilty of racketeering, bribery and attempted extortion.

The jury that convicted Burke in December found developer Charles Cui guilty of bribery and lying to the FBI.
U.S. District Judge Virginia Kendall told Burke at the end of his sentencing hearing last month that he’d have 14 days to appeal. Nothing has been filed.
Kendall most recently made headlines with the two-year prison sentence she handed to former Ald. Edward M. Burke. Kendall’s ascension and replacement of outgoing Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer are dictated by law.
USA vs. Timothy Mapes

Timothy Mapes served for decades as the chief of staff to then-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. He was accused of perjury and attempted obstruction of justice for a bid to block the feds’ Madigan investigation. A jury found him guilty on both counts and agreed that he lied on every occasion identified by prosecutors.

But lawyers for Tim Mapes argue their client should be sentenced to time served, supervised release and “significant” community service.
The women went public with accusations of harassment, retaliation and cover-up by Madigan and those around him. Although the trial focused on charges that Mapes lied to a grand jury, the women say the verdict will still send a message to other victims.
Tim Mapes, the former chief of staff to onetime Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, is the seventh person to be convicted by a federal jury in Chicago this year as a result of public corruption investigations.
USA vs. James Weiss

Businessman James Weiss, son-in-law of former Cook County Assessor Joseph Berrios, was accused of paying bribes to state lawmakers to advance legislation. Weiss was found guilty of wire and mail fraud, bribery, and lying to the FBI.

A 10-page memo Tuesday offered few new details about Link’s cooperation or crime, but it showed the value of Link’s undercover work to the feds.
Link testified that he’d withdrawn money from his campaign account and “used some for gambling.” He also told jurors that “I was helping a friend who was in dire need.”
The judge spent part of the businessman’s sentencing hearing asking about Chicago’s persistent graft, saying to a prosecutor, ‘Why does public corruption keep happening?’
ComEd Bribery Trial

Four power players were accused of trying to bribe former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan to benefit ComEd. The four were found guilty.

U.S. District Judge Manish Shah left intact the conspiracy conviction and other counts against the four defendants, convicted of an illegal effort to influence former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan as ComEd legislation moved through Springfield.
Defense attorneys are pointing to a Feb. 10 executive order from President Donald Trump pausing enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The president’s order says the law’s use has been “stretched beyond proper bounds and abused in a manner that harms the interests of the United States.”
The deal was modeled after a similar one issued in 2020 to electrical company ComEd. ComEd was spared prosecution after cooperating with the feds and paying a $200 million fine.
ComEd Landing Page backup image
A look at some of the key players involved in the case and the trial, and a timeline of key events leading up to it, as outlined in court records.
USA v. Annazette Collins

Annazette Collins was a former state lawmaker accused of cheating on her taxes in an indictment related to the investigation of former House Speaker Michael Madigan. A jury found her guilty of filing false tax returns for certain years and failing to file in others.

Ex-state Sen. Annazette Collins told the judge that she “let the voters down” and is “determined to never be in this situation again.”
Jurors, deliberating over two days, found her guilty on four of six counts. Collins was acquitted on one count that she failed to file a corporate income tax return for her lobbying firm for 2015, and another count that she filed a false individual tax return for 2018.
The disclosure came Friday after Annazette Collins signaled she would testify during her ongoing trial on charges she dodged nearly $100,000 in taxes. She later changed her mind and decided not to take the stand.
USA v. Alex Acevedo

Alex Acevedo, a son of former state Rep. Eddie Acevedo, went to trial on tax charges related to the investigation of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. Alex Acevedo was found guilty.

Alex Acevedo’s prison term is longer than the one-month sentence handed to his brother but shorter than the 6 months his father got. Both were also found guilty of tax violations.
Alex Acevedo, his brother Michael Acevedo and their father were charged with cheating on their taxes in indictments in February 2021. Edward Acevedo pleaded guilty in December 2021 to tax evasion, was sentenced to six months behind bars and was released last month.
Alex Acevedo, his brother Michael Acevedo and their father were each charged with cheating on their taxes in separate indictments handed up in February 2021.